海浩网论坛

标题: 哪位访问这个IP速度快? [打印本页]

作者: erjing    时间: 2009-3-15 11:16:31     标题: 哪位访问这个IP速度快?

87.237.39.197
EVA on-line的,我这里是:
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=483ms TTL=117
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=411ms TTL=117
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=434ms TTL=117
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=458ms TTL=117

Ping statistics for 87.237.39.197:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 411ms, Maximum = 483ms, Average = 446ms

最大483,最小也要411了。新疆电信的网络。
谁的速度快一点呀?要是新加坡,香港的最好。
要是访问这个速度快,可否再ping一下61.128.99.133这个服务器,如果访问这个服务器也快。。。那俺考虑放个机器在那边做个vpn..
作者: 及时雨    时间: 2009-3-15 11:20:57

我只会截图。。。
作者: dea    时间: 2009-3-15 11:32:05

正在 Ping 87.237.39.197 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 87.237.39.197 的回复: 字节=32 时间=374ms TTL=115
来自 87.237.39.197 的回复: 字节=32 时间=372ms TTL=115
来自 87.237.39.197 的回复: 字节=32 时间=372ms TTL=115
请求超时。

87.237.39.197 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 3,丢失 = 1 (25% 丢失),
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 372ms,最长 = 374ms,平均 = 372ms

C:\>ping 87.237.39.197

正在 Ping 87.237.39.197 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 87.237.39.197 的回复: 字节=32 时间=372ms TTL=115
请求超时。
请求超时。
来自 87.237.39.197 的回复: 字节=32 时间=375ms TTL=115

87.237.39.197 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 2,丢失 = 2 (50% 丢失),
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 372ms,最长 = 375ms,平均 = 373ms

C:\>ping 87.237.39.197

正在 Ping 87.237.39.197 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 87.237.39.197 的回复: 字节=32 时间=380ms TTL=115
来自 87.237.39.197 的回复: 字节=32 时间=375ms TTL=115
来自 87.237.39.197 的回复: 字节=32 时间=374ms TTL=115
来自 87.237.39.197 的回复: 字节=32 时间=372ms TTL=115

87.237.39.197 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 372ms,最长 = 380ms,平均 = 375ms

C:\>ping 61.128.99.133

正在 Ping 61.128.99.133 具有 32 字节的数据:
请求超时。
来自 61.128.99.133 的回复: 字节=32 时间=101ms TTL=248
来自 61.128.99.133 的回复: 字节=32 时间=103ms TTL=248
来自 61.128.99.133 的回复: 字节=32 时间=104ms TTL=248

61.128.99.133 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 3,丢失 = 1 (25% 丢失),
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 101ms,最长 = 104ms,平均 = 102ms

C:\>ping 61.128.99.133

正在 Ping 61.128.99.133 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 61.128.99.133 的回复: 字节=32 时间=103ms TTL=248
来自 61.128.99.133 的回复: 字节=32 时间=103ms TTL=248
来自 61.128.99.133 的回复: 字节=32 时间=101ms TTL=248
来自 61.128.99.133 的回复: 字节=32 时间=100ms TTL=248

61.128.99.133 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 100ms,最长 = 103ms,平均 = 101ms
作者: huazai202    时间: 2009-3-15 11:36:43

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 87.237.39.197

Pinging 87.237.39.197 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=439ms TTL=114
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=488ms TTL=114
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=511ms TTL=114
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=470ms TTL=114

Ping statistics for 87.237.39.197:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 439ms, Maximum = 511ms, Average = 477ms
作者: erjing    时间: 2009-3-15 11:52:35

看来访问伦敦的服务器是个问题。。。国内如何访问都差不多。。。谢谢楼上诸位啦。
猪哥在不在?帮俺在新加坡测试一下。
作者: 及时雨    时间: 2009-3-15 12:55:40

原帖由 erjing 于 2009-3-15 11:52 发表
看来访问伦敦的服务器是个问题。。。国内如何访问都差不多。。。谢谢楼上诸位啦。
猪哥在不在?帮俺在新加坡测试一下。

你等会,我带笔记本过去。我到了喊你。。
作者: 猴哥    时间: 2009-3-15 13:19:40

俺试试
作者: 猴哥    时间: 2009-3-15 13:21:21

原帖由 及时雨 于 2009-3-15 12:55 发表

你等会,我带笔记本过去。我到了喊你。。

友情提示:新加坡海关严查笔记本电脑携带XXX
一旦发现割小JJ
作者: 老凤凰    时间: 2009-3-15 13:48:16

猴哥的头像
真有想切他小JJ的冲动。
作者: 及时雨    时间: 2009-3-15 13:50:18

原帖由 猴哥 于 2009-3-15 13:21 发表

友情提示:新加坡海关严查笔记本电脑携带XXX
一旦发现割小JJ

那老猪的咋带过去的。。我不信。莫非老猪的被切了?
作者: erjing    时间: 2009-3-15 14:14:51

原帖由 猴哥 于 2009-3-15 13:19 发表
俺试试

靠眼红!!!!
你ping 61.128.99.133多少?
作者: erjing    时间: 2009-3-15 14:17:18

原帖由 及时雨 于 2009-3-15 12:55 发表

你等会,我带笔记本过去。我到了喊你。。

....裸泳过去吗?
作者: 微尘    时间: 2009-3-15 15:55:08

k@debian:~$ ping 87.237.39.197
PING 87.237.39.197 (87.237.39.197) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 87.237.39.197: icmp_seq=1 ttl=115 time=331 ms
64 bytes from 87.237.39.197: icmp_seq=2 ttl=115 time=328 ms
64 bytes from 87.237.39.197: icmp_seq=3 ttl=115 time=327 ms
64 bytes from 87.237.39.197: icmp_seq=4 ttl=115 time=329 ms
64 bytes from 87.237.39.197: icmp_seq=5 ttl=115 time=327 ms
64 bytes from 87.237.39.197: icmp_seq=6 ttl=115 time=328 ms
64 bytes from 87.237.39.197: icmp_seq=7 ttl=115 time=329 ms
^C
--- 87.237.39.197 ping statistics ---
7 packets transmitted, 7 received, 0% packet loss, time 6015ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 327.386/329.133/331.461/1.321 ms
@debian:~$ ping 61.128.99.133
PING 61.128.99.133 (61.128.99.133) 56(84) bytes of data.
]64 bytes from 61.128.99.133: icmp_seq=1 ttl=246 time=69.7 ms
64 bytes from 61.128.99.133: icmp_seq=2 ttl=246 time=69.8 ms
64 bytes from 61.128.99.133: icmp_seq=3 ttl=246 time=69.9 ms
64 bytes from 61.128.99.133: icmp_seq=4 ttl=246 time=69.9 ms
64 bytes from 61.128.99.133: icmp_seq=5 ttl=246 time=69.6 ms
64 bytes from 61.128.99.133: icmp_seq=6 ttl=246 time=70.3 ms
^C
--- 61.128.99.133 ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 5018ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 69.680/69.916/70.311/0.215 ms
@debian:~$
作者: erjing    时间: 2009-3-15 17:06:46

微尘你在哪里呀?用的啥线路?
要是能在300以下就好啦。
作者: 微尘    时间: 2009-3-15 17:35:31

长沙宁乡县城
网管100M
作者: 毛毛虫    时间: 2009-3-15 19:02:54

深圳电信

Pinging 87.237.39.197 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=444ms TTL=115
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=439ms TTL=115
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=441ms TTL=115
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=441ms TTL=115

Ping statistics for 87.237.39.197:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 439ms, Maximum = 444ms, Average = 441ms
作者: blackwhite    时间: 2009-3-15 23:09:21

--- 87.237.39.197 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 140.354/140.722/141.224/0.263 ms

--- 61.128.99.133 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 396.801/397.111/397.380/0.197 ms
作者: 摩登大圣    时间: 2009-3-15 23:28:34     标题: 武汉

Pinging 87.237.39.197 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=122ms TTL=114
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=148ms TTL=114
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=186ms TTL=114
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=154ms TTL=114

Ping statistics for 87.237.39.197:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 122ms, Maximum = 186ms, Average = 152ms
作者: 摩登大圣    时间: 2009-3-15 23:29:18     标题: 武汉

Pinging 61.128.99.133 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=246
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=246
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=246
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=246

Ping statistics for 61.128.99.133:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 34ms, Maximum = 61ms, Average = 42ms
作者: erjing    时间: 2009-3-15 23:34:45

原帖由 blackwhite 于 2009-3-15 23:09 发表
--- 87.237.39.197 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 140.354/140.722/141.224/0.263 ms

--- 61.128.99.133 ping statistic ...

您老也来了。。。。
作者: erjing    时间: 2009-3-15 23:38:35

我艾你。

[ 本帖最后由 erjing 于 2009-3-15 23:54 编辑 ]
作者: 猴哥    时间: 2009-3-15 23:55:44

原帖由 erjing 于 2009-3-15 14:14 发表

靠眼红!!!!
你ping 61.128.99.133多少?

不咋滴
作者: erjing    时间: 2009-3-16 00:15:30

猴哥离硅谷多远?如果你这个速度都能玩...哪我这也能玩了啊。
作者: erjing    时间: 2009-3-16 00:16:40

靠看错了,丫是ping的中国的DNS服务器。。。我是要87.237.39.197的结果...
作者: guodl    时间: 2009-3-16 04:06:47

二斤一稿多发:

Pinging 87.237.39.197 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=285ms TTL=116
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=279ms TTL=116
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=279ms TTL=116
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=283ms TTL=116

Ping statistics for 87.237.39.197:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 279ms, Maximum = 285ms, Average = 281ms
作者: guodl    时间: 2009-3-16 04:07:33

Pinging 61.128.99.133 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=281ms TTL=237
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=280ms TTL=237
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=281ms TTL=237
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=280ms TTL=237

Ping statistics for 61.128.99.133:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 280ms, Maximum = 281ms, Average = 280ms
作者: guodl    时间: 2009-3-16 04:08:51

原帖由 erjing 于 2009-3-15 11:52 发表
看来访问伦敦的服务器是个问题。。。国内如何访问都差不多。。。谢谢楼上诸位啦。
猪哥在不在?帮俺在新加坡测试一下。


不好意思,看到PM才来的. 结果在上面了.
作者: guodl    时间: 2009-3-16 04:09:34

原帖由 erjing 于 2009-3-15 23:38 发表
我艾你。



作者: 猴哥    时间: 2009-3-16 08:33:31

原帖由 erjing 于 2009-3-16 00:16 发表
靠看错了,丫是ping的中国的DNS服务器。。。我是要87.237.39.197的结果...

那个在7楼。先贴的啊
是你丫让我再ping个87.237.39.197的啊
作者: mark_mark    时间: 2009-3-16 08:35:44

Pinging 87.237.39.197 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=112
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=112
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=112
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=112
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=112
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=112
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=275ms TTL=112
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=112
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=112
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=112
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=112
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=112

Ping statistics for 87.237.39.197:
    Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 273ms, Maximum = 275ms, Average = 273ms
Control-C
---------------------------------
Pinging 61.128.99.133 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=247
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=247
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=247
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=247
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=247
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=247
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=247
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=247
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=247
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=247

Ping statistics for 61.128.99.133:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 54ms, Maximum = 56ms, Average = 54ms
作者: erjing    时间: 2009-3-16 09:13:18

Mark在哪里呢?
作者: guodl    时间: 2009-3-16 09:19:46

Mark在天津
作者: Ivan    时间: 2009-3-16 09:33:24

Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=435ms TTL=116
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=429ms TTL=116
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=467ms TTL=116
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=441ms TTL=116
作者: 妮可宝贝    时间: 2009-3-16 09:42:04

Pinging 87.237.39.197 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=356ms TTL=117
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=349ms TTL=117
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=353ms TTL=117
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=351ms TTL=117



Pinging 61.128.99.133 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=249
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=249
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=249
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=249
作者: mark_mark    时间: 2009-3-16 11:27:01

原帖由 erjing 于 2009-3-16 09:13 发表
Mark在哪里呢?



你是版主竟然看不到我ip?
作者: excel    时间: 2009-3-16 13:05:47

Pinging 87.237.39.197 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=335ms TTL=109
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=327ms TTL=109
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=328ms TTL=109
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=329ms TTL=109
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=329ms TTL=109
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=329ms TTL=109
Reply from 87.237.39.197: bytes=32 time=336ms TTL=109
作者: excel    时间: 2009-3-16 13:08:28

Pinging 61.128.99.133 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=242
Request timed out.
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=242
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=242
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=242
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=242
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=242
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=242
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=242
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=242
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=242
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=242
Reply from 61.128.99.133: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=242




欢迎光临 海浩网论坛 (http://bbs.highot.net/) Powered by Discuz! X2